From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPQib-0003GX-D5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:08:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64889E084B; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBCAE084B for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F9465A5E for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:58:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.053 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.053 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.546, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7rSAu6X3tKUe for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E0D659C5 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JPQYX-0008TB-5S for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:58:21 +0000 Received: from ip68-231-12-179.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.12.179]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:58:21 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-12-179.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:58:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] global useflags Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20080213210132.720760ba@gentoo.org> <20080213213836.18f659ef@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-12-179.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f622a07f-6628-470f-a6b6-4ce7b37c6fc9 X-Archives-Hash: 3af88bfbac06ebd56540987abeee648f Markus Meier posted 20080213213836.18f659ef@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:38:36 +0100: > djvu: Enable support for DjVu (a digital document format with advanced > compression technology and high performance value) I'm not complaining if this is deemed acceptable, but I thought the idea=20 was to keep it to 80 chars, if possible. If that's the case, perhaps=20 leaving it at (a digital document format) might be preferable. That=20 still says at least what it is, so is workable IMO, even if the longer=20 description is certainly nicer if the 80 char limit no longer applies. IOW, just because the proposal above may be too long isn't reason to just= =20 say it enables support for DjVu, without anything else. =3D8^) Knowing=20 it's a doc format is much more useful and higher priority than the=20 compression/performance stuff, if something has to be left out. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list