From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J4iRs-0008QR-VG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:49:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBIJmqCb013292; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:48:52 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBIJkVkY010288 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:46:32 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F996555F for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:46:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.995 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.995 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.604, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xIHP-sVeO-Zo for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9648E65FD4 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J4iO6-0000b9-Ft for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:45:58 +0000 Received: from ip68-231-12-179.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.12.179]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:45:58 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-12-179.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:45:58 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <200712172320.01988.peper@gentoo.org> <47671006.2020808@gentoo.org> <20071218001855.78c1864c@blueyonder.co.uk> <18279.29725.449851.982897@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4767D1CD.9020301@gentoo.org> <20071218142427.GA4423@ferdyx.org> <18280.1351.712532.751120@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20071218175632.GC4423@ferdyx.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-12-179.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: d6e561d0-7f74-41b4-83cf-55c0b0d549aa X-Archives-Hash: b258853042089d5c11ff4dc1def0d6e3 "Fernando J. Pereda" posted 20071218175632.GC4423@ferdyx.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:56:32 +0100: >> And as we have now learned that EAPI strings are not limited to digits >> (see ciaranm's message) and may even contain blanks (see grobian's >> message), we would have ebuilds with very strange filenames. > > What's the problem with this? 'app-shells/bash-3.2_p17-r1.ebuild-prefix 1' (note the space) anyone? How about when we have a dozen or so EAPIs active, several of which apply to a specific ebuild? 'app-shells/bash-3.2_p17-r1.ebuild-prefix 1 2 foo zork bar baz fa querty 3 8 4' (and that example uses no odd chars beyond the EAPI component space separator)? -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list