From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IfesE-0002uv-NS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:57:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9AGktjS000865; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:46:55 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9AGiwl5030929 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:44:58 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BDE65366 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:44:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.41 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.41 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.189, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9E79ESGrQI+D for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EE26501C for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IfduE-0001x3-DH for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:55:30 +0000 Received: from ip68-230-96-73.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.96.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:55:30 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-96-73.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:55:30 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: lame use flag, local to global Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <470C40F0.8050501@gentoo.org> <1192002003.19716.2.camel@localhost> <470CD9B5.3000706@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-96-73.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 1727abf6-25d1-4001-b808-910cfd470d38 X-Archives-Hash: 00020c9095e31e0f0010f1bfea859b31 Steve Dibb posted 470CD9B5.3000706@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:55:01 -0600: > The reason we have mp3 and lame use flag is because there is more than > one mp3 encoder. In almost every case of the use flag being applied > above, there is already support for another mp3 codec (ffmpeg). So, > lame adds support for lame, not for mp3, which is also provided. In that case, shouldn't the description mention that? Something like: MP3 encoding support using LAME (as opposed to ffmpeg) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list