From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-26755-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1Icdm8-00040P-U5
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:10:45 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l92909HV005037;
Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:00:09 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l928uigd030902
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:56:45 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACF464615
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.414 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.185,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 7gsj1B+KcWTx for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:56:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8A0641B4
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:56:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1IcdYC-0007dc-UI
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:56:21 +0000
Received: from ip68-230-96-73.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.96.73])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:56:20 +0000
Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-96-73.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:56:20 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: sh versionator.eclass
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 08:56:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2007.10.02.08.56.13@cox.net>
References: <200710012259.40589.uberlord@gentoo.org>
<20071001224136.GA9048@ferdyx.org> <200710012348.55548.uberlord@gentoo.org>
<200710012022.21957.vapier@gentoo.org>
<1191306400.63509.4.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-96-73.ph.ph.cox.net
User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 5653d8e7-109e-40f7-9ca3-57dbfd1fbb79
X-Archives-Hash: bbb05211200c85a294b6fdf85a3b8156
Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org> posted
1191306400.63509.4.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name, excerpted below, on
Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:26:39 +0100:
>> > > but I find interesting that
>> > > you ripped Ciaran's copyright while leaving the "Prod ciaranm if
>> > > you find something it can't handle" comment.
>> >
>> > I copied and pasted the comments for the most part. Sorry for leaving
>> > that bit in. And I thought that the Gentoo Foundation had the
>> > copyright?
>>
>> it does. and if it doesnt, punt the file and rewrite it from scratch.
>
> Well, this should constitute a rewrite from scratch.
That's good, because IIRC, Ciaranm has stated before that he did /not/
sign the copyright hand-over -- it wasn't required by the time he
came around, so if I'm not mistaken, particularly since that's what the
original claimed, that /would/ be copyright Ciaran. However, a rewrite
should take care of it, so as I said, good, if you're planning on
reassigning. I'd still consider putting in a "based on ..." crediting
him, as only polite, but I don't know that it's necessary.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list