From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ia99I-0003Y0-BF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:04:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l8PBsNE9001036; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:54:23 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8PBoaAv026881 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:50:36 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A770C654F1 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:50:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.507 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.507 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.743, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_DOB=0.732, RCVD_IN_DOB=1.103] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZmWcczYMnz3D for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFFA656D7 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ia77u-0006pb-FU for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:54:46 +0000 Received: from ip68-230-96-73.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.96.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:54:46 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-96-73.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:54:46 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/udev: ChangeLog udev-115-r6.ebuild Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20070924200956.GS22279@supernova> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-96-73.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 60975ff1-1f47-49a7-a414-3db5e6e54d57 X-Archives-Hash: 53068be35fea63099f5cc0f742aee189 Ryan Hill posted fd9r7m$6p7$1@sea.gmane.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:19:34 -0600: > Duncan wrote: >> Can you point me (and anyone else that may be interested) to a nice >> explanation of the difference? I've always wondered why [[ ]] is >> considered "better" than [ ] for tests. > > check out http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/testconstructs.html#DBLBRACKETS Thanks (to Mike and Lars too). Seems I have some reading to do. =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list