From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I4zBB-0002kC-JC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:09:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l61D8TWS009358; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:08:29 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l61D6cUR007107 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:06:38 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271D4654EC for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:06:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.200] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o94oW9cU58ea for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CEB654E5 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I4z8F-0004M7-Uv for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:06:27 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-67-77.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.67.77]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:06:27 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-67-77.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:06:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: kde-misc/kdbus Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <46876A05.30805@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-67-77.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l61D8TYV009358 X-Archives-Salt: b4fad30b-140d-4457-a3bf-4e3097db375f X-Archives-Hash: e23b14b03505633738cc2def8562ad5f Petteri R=C3=A4ty posted 46876A05.30805@gentoo.or= g, excerpted below, on Sun, 01 Jul 2007 11:47:01 +0300: > +# Petteri R=C3=A4ty (01 Jul 2007)=20 > +# Upstream describes this as: > +# Buggy and unmaintained D-BUS service browser for KDE.=20 > +# Seems to segmentation fault on me on startup with current=20 > +# dbus. Removal in 30 days unless someone else takes this=20 > +# package and fixes the problems. > +kde-misc/kdbus > + FWIW, it seems to work fine here, no segfaults I could cause just=20 browsing tho I didn't try sending any dbus messages with it. ~amd64 (so=20 KDE 3.5.7) here except that I've unmasked gcc-4.2.0, and as recommended,=20 done the emerge --emptytree thing. So I've got a pretty freshly rebuilt=20 system, but it doesn't segfault here, even built with gcc-4.2.0. So it can't be /entirely/ borken. I don't use it, and as you're the=20 maintainer, if you wish to kill it, I've no objections. Just sayin' it=20 /does/ still work, so you'll need a reason other than that, even if it's=20 just that you're tired of it and it's not a big loss since KDE-4's coming= =20 up and it's unmaintained, so would appear to be on borrowed time anyway. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list