From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I0Nzj-00040v-Fj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:38:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5IKaxHV011406; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:36:59 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5IKXk29006794 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:33:46 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1641E64A8D for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:33:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.207 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.207 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.207] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-TolIE2OQYl for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0984964F2F for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I0Ns7-0008Tr-Rb for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:30:47 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-66-205.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.66.205]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:30:47 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-66-205.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:30:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <46701D06.5080302@gentoo.org> <20070617140632.GB7280@localhost.localdomain> <46758047.3050608@gentoo.org> <1182192651.14981.43.camel@workbox.quova.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-66-205.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 14e14632-c30c-4bcf-b96c-8f101d1a8b07 X-Archives-Hash: 64ce50006c4cdf344699fefecf99ab8c Chris Gianelloni posted 1182192651.14981.43.camel@workbox.quova.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:50:51 -0700: > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 08:58 +0000, Duncan wrote: >> So at this point it's pretty much up to the maintainer. Why are the >> rest of us still discussing it? > > Because, like everything else, too many people on this list have to get > in the last word. > > Also, there's nothing in our policy that really keeps skype from going > stable, as I see it. It doesn't *have* to remain in testing, it would > just end up more convenient for the maintainer that way, and if he > decides to go that route, I fully support it, even though it does mean > dropping stable KEYWORDS on a package in the tree (which *is* against > policy and I suspect the reason this discussion was started). Voice of clarity and reason. Thanks. =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list