From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HZzUh-0000mU-UU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:13:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l371CZ07009268; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:12:35 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l371AZpR006951 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:10:35 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F8E6408B for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:10:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.938 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.938 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.015, TW_SV=0.077] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QXs6CmbxhafY for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CAB64A1C for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HZzR9-0007D1-0T for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 03:09:51 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-13-55.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.13.55]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 03:09:51 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-13-55.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Apr 2007 03:09:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right? Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20070405230345.GA22227@paradox.datanode.net> <20070406205731.064b03a7@uberlaptop.marples.name> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-13-55.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.126 (Demon Sweat) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 8fdcbfbf-23e6-46bc-a3ec-b20d793fedf3 X-Archives-Hash: 9c87dbe41aa4f88257126bc8b7e36180 Roy Marples posted 20070406205731.064b03a7@uberlaptop.marples.name, excerpted below, on Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:57:31 +0100: > dhcpcd-3.0.16 is going stable right now after many months in ~ARCH. =8^) > baselayout-2 entered our svn repo a few days ago and is undergoing a few > last minute fixes/tweaks before it enters ~ARCH. Does that imply baselayout-1.13-alphaX is never to stabilize? I'm ~arch, but have been using it without issue for some time now, and /had/ sort of expected 1.13 to stabilize before tackling 2.x. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list