From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-21940-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HVVsP-0000iH-Vj
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:47:30 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2PGjwFl014674;
Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:45:58 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2PGfnem008574
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:42:10 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23C864B33
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:41:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.114
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.114 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.114]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id uNbuRUUNTwYp for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0407643C5
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1HVVmj-0000pP-03
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:41:37 +0200
Received: from ip68-231-13-122.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.13.122])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:41:36 +0200
Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-13-122.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:41:36 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposed addition to the Social Contract
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:41:27 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan.2007.03.25.16.41.27@cox.net>
References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich>
<200703251100.00415.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070325160719.0a4d15c3@snowflake>
<200703251116.13901.vapier@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-13-122.ph.ph.cox.net
User-Agent: Pan/0.125 (Potzrebie)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 40da35d9-86ba-4a73-b0ac-0fe899a3ab12
X-Archives-Hash: 916f786359668b2b5b1be1c0c5dc600a
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> posted
200703251116.13901.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 25 Mar
2007 11:16:13 -0400:
> well, while we're protecting Gentoo from hypothetical situations that
> dont exist now but could in the future, we should add a clause that bans
> collusion with Lucifer as that would of course give us a bad rep
Umm... let's not go where this seems to be heading...
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list