From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EwN7F-0005gD-So for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:17:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0AHFkBW030814; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:15:46 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0AHDm9f010638 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:13:48 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EwN47-000759-Qz for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:13:48 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EwN3g-0001jc-P4 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:13:20 +0100 Received: from ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.97.182]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:13:20 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:13:20 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout 1.12 and runlevel changes Was: init scripts and custom signals Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:11:52 -0700 Organization: Organization? Only haphazardly. Message-ID: References: <200601091232.32522.uberlord@gentoo.org> <200601101131.21791.uberlord@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 6ffb40f1-125c-4c5c-bff4-4a32816c1e7f X-Archives-Hash: c85d82a1ec24cc47596affc6422b6aab Roy Marples posted <200601101131.21791.uberlord@gentoo.org>, excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:31:21 +0000: > On Tuesday 10 January 2006 08:19, Duncan wrote: >> >> I've noticed that with baselayout-1.12 (not sure on <1.12 as I didn't >> notice it, tho that might mean it's new behavior), changing runlevels >> stops, then restarts, services that are in both runlevels. Is it >> intended behavior on Gentoo to force them to stop, only to restart them >> on the new runlevel, when they exist in both? > > Nope, that's an error. I think I have a patch that addresses that. =8^) Good. I was afraid it was supposed to be that way, for some reason. I'm working on and off on scripting a working suspend-to-disk for my system (non-trivial as it's dual CPU Opteron, and that's only beginning to be supported, so I have to figure out what I can safely continue running and what has to be manually killed to safely suspend, then manually restarted afterward), and am using changes in runlevels to handle killing the network and etc, as the interrupts from it interfere with the suspend stuff. Watching it kill and restart the stuff in both runlevels every time was getting irritating, so I'm glad it's not /supposed/ to be that way. So that means don't bother filing a bug, then, as you are already working on it? > I've also noticed that there is a lot of stuff in runscript.sh that > doesn't need to be there anymore as rc now handles more of the ordering > and dependency. Leaving runscript.sh with just what it "needs" means > it's a whole load lighter :) Always nice to be able to clear out a bunch of old cruft! =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list