From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EAbmk-0001m0-9r
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:14:26 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7VNAt9q023595;
	Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:10:55 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7VN85UY020183
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:08:06 GMT
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EAbis-0004RV-G4
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:10:26 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EAbhE-0007eV-8s
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:08:44 +0200
Received: from ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.97.182])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:08:44 +0200
Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:08:44 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles
Date:  Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:06:16 -0700
Organization:  Sometimes
Message-ID:  <pan.2005.08.31.23.06.15.17065@cox.net>
References:  <20050829203259.GA13987@nightcrawler> <1125351816.1964.148.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20050829231247.104e9ff8@snowdrop.home> <1125404657.1964.167.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4314715E.5000809@gentoo.org> <4314BA18.8040009@egr.msu.edu> <1125436518.15621.54.camel@darksystem> <20050830214002.1ce72cc2@localhost> <pan.2005.08.31.12.36.51.534697@cox.net> <4315AE3D.30700@gentoo.org> <20050831161516.GJ18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-97-182.ph.ph.cox.net
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 94a50584-4940-4368-98d4-6244eed0f16f
X-Archives-Hash: da00e4f7f7f46abebf31ba41ea34bd1d

Grant Goodyear posted <20050831161516.GJ18440@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu>,
excerpted below,  on Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:15:16 -0500:

> Stephen P. Becker wrote: [Wed Aug 31 2005, 08:18:53AM CDT]
>> We don't "live with that problem on MIPS" because it doesn't exist.  If 
>> something doesn't work in one spot, we dont' stable keyword it...simple 
>> as that.  Also keep in mind that for some stuff, we don't have to test 
>> on both.  For example, we have no supported little endian machines that 
>> are capable of running X, therefore, we don't care about testing X 
>> there.  See how it works?
> 
> So, the basic suggestion is that x86 and amd64 would both use the same
> keyword, but that for cases such as valgrind pre-3.0, which didn't work
> at all on amd64, then those package are profile-masked, and there's 
> separate amd64 and x86 profiles (as there are now) to handle those
> distinctions?

Thanks!...  Now that's something concrete enough to wrap my brain around,
which is exactly what I was asking for.  Consider the "magic" explained.
Like so much "magic", there's a perfectly good explanation, once you grasp
the concept!  =8^)

I still don't necessarily think it's the best solution for a problem that
seems decently solved as it is (not that my opinion really counts anyway,
as just a user, not one of the many actually doing the work), but at
least I have a clue about how it can be done, now, something I was lacking
the "Eureka moment" necessary to grasp, previously. =8^)  Now I can at
least intelligently follow the debate.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list