From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4Q9ALtQ030568 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 09:10:21 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbENl-0007MR-Lc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 09:10:25 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DbELP-0007Do-2t for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 11:07:59 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.66.193]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 11:07:59 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 11:07:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 02:08:47 -0700 Organization: Sometimes Message-ID: References: <200505251820.02637.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: e9186a0b-7525-4efc-8c98-abd5bfaa1562 X-Archives-Hash: ca14124e1e98a061ee51be54ad02b144 Mike Frysinger posted <200505251820.02637.vapier@gentoo.org>, excerpted below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 18:20:02 -0400: > can people please try out baselayout-1.11.12-r2+ and see if they notice any > regressions ? the 'best' tests are simply rebooting and seeing if your > system comes up :) I've been running baselayout-1.11.12+ since it went ~amd64. It has been very smooth going, far more so than previous versions, where net, specifically macchanger, wasn't working right without module script tweaking (that was bugged and eventually fixed). Hmm.. I /did/ have issues with parallel startup a couple revisions back. I had disabled that and haven't reenabled it yet. I suppose I should do that and bug it now, if it still fails. It /was/ working at one point. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list