From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4Q7XIPd015403 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 07:33:19 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbCrq-0003J9-6k for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 07:33:22 +0000 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DbCob-0005w1-Qw for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 09:30:01 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.66.193]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 09:30:01 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 09:30:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: KDE 3.4 visibility support disabled Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 00:30:07 -0700 Organization: Sometimes Message-ID: References: <200505251748.27667.cryos@gentoo.org> <200505260725.29929.danarmak@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: news Cc: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 295c66a5-23d5-4417-9980-192491e21dd4 X-Archives-Hash: b0f1f4ba7a00056126926f836bc552fb Dan Armak posted <200505260725.29929.danarmak@gentoo.org>, excerpted below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 07:25:21 +0300: > That's going to kill it everywhere, gcc4 included. The way KDE uses hidden > visibility is itself broken - not gcc. Until that's fixed, we're disabling > visibility support in kde. (There was a separate bug in gcc itself which got > fixed, which may have confused some people...) Ahh... yes. Distinctive separate bug makes more sense, now. I had only known about the gcc bug. So the KDE problem... Is that what's causing all those virtual function but destructor isn't virtual type warnings whenever I compile a KDE ebuild with gcc4? -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list