From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4PNrPY5003372 for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 23:53:26 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Db5gk-0001QJ-C3 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 23:53:26 +0000 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Db5dR-0008PJ-OX for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 26 May 2005 01:50:01 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.66.193]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 01:50:01 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 01:50:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: KDE 3.4 visibility support disabled Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:37:33 -0700 Organization: Sometimes Message-ID: References: <200505251748.27667.cryos@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: news Cc: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 1ec733b8-d021-4402-95ab-c70344290669 X-Archives-Hash: e0e7c11d70a251e3c56dd9d7b27d4aa5 Marcus D. Hanwell posted <200505251748.27667.cryos@gentoo.org>, excerpted below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100: > I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that > disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the > patches). This was a new feature in KDE 3.4 which has caused at least one > obvious bug, and possibly others that are less obvious[1]. [note the cross-posting] That isn't going to kill it for gcc-4.0.1-snapshots, right, only gcc-3.4? I'll be rather unhappy if the speed increases I've been attributing to that visibility support under gcc4, disappear! =8^( -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list