From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j44AtPCt003836 for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 10:55:25 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DTHXO-0006cI-G1 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 10:55:30 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DTHQk-00047v-8t for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 12:48:38 +0200 Received: from ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.66.193]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 May 2005 12:48:38 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 May 2005 12:48:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some new xorg ebuilds Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 03:54:49 -0700 Organization: Sometimes Message-ID: References: <4264BAB1.5050804@gentoo.org> <4265B00F.2030506@gentoo.org> <4265C541.9020104@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-66-193.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 4dd834d3-5783-49c4-8499-f2495e7c7b2b X-Archives-Hash: b18c4fbf4ab5e0382cfa8741550834a0 Donnie Berkholz posted <4265C541.9020104@gentoo.org>, excerpted below, on Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:58:09 -0700: > Daniel Goller wrote: >> do you want both on one bug or seperate bugs, from your email, you do >> want success and problems on bugs.g.o, correct? do you want hardware >> info/binary drivers used added? > > Basically emerge info and xorg.conf, from which I can suck out your > architecture, xorg USE flags, toolchain and driver. > > Successes are only really interesting for 6.8.99.*. THe other, I expect > to work fairly well. OK, I'm currently running the 6.8.99.3 snapshot, on ~amd64 w/ the radeon xorg native drivers and gcc-3.4.3. No issues with it save for the previously posted font problems, now corrected I gather. However, my question is do you want gcc-4.0.0 bugs yet, or not? I tried remerging w/ gcc4 without success, and now that I see the .99.5 snapshot out, before I go trying to upgrade to it, I'm wondering if it's worth my while to try it under my gcc4 gcc-profile, bugging success/failure, or if you aren't ready for that yet and I should just report on gcc-3.4.3 merges (gcc-3.3 is deprecated on amd64). -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list