From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22077 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2004 20:16:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Sep 2004 20:16:47 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CC1vS-0001U7-56 for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:16:46 +0000 Received: (qmail 15831 invoked by uid 89); 27 Sep 2004 20:16:45 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 5558 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2004 20:16:44 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:16:40 -0700 Organization: Sometimes Message-ID: References: <200409271101.42703.pauldv@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-66-58.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Sender: news Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage 2.0.51 comments/questions X-Archives-Salt: 4c4fa8a4-46b0-40a5-a2db-5e6e91a05efb X-Archives-Hash: 7e83f1ce841164ba764ebd34bb35b6fc Paul de Vrieze posted <200409271101.42703.pauldv@gentoo.org>, excerpted below, on Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:01:42 +0200: > On Monday 27 September 2004 05:52, Duncan wrote: >> >> Evidently .51 is rather stricter in some things than .50 and a number >> of things are QA Notices now that were silent, before. Are things to >> the point where it's worthwhile bugging the various ebuilds that emit >> these notices, illegal eclass inheritance and the like, or are there >> still enough of them it'd just be unnecessary noise? > > If you could come up with patches for those ebuilds (or eclasses) then > please post them to bugzilla. (We get the notices too) Without patches it > is probably more of an annoyance than actually useful (most maintainers > know about them). Thanks. I figured something of that nature. My ability in that area is somewhat limited and I haven't looked to see if it's within my range, yet, so I'll avoid filing on them now. I had just seen enough of them to goad me into asking, lest I be guilty of not giving back where I could, since one thing I /can/ do is file bugs! -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list