From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: new global use flag and a new category
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:51:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2004.08.30.08.51.19.855001@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040829214235.5115ef57.spider@gentoo.org
Spider posted <20040829214235.5115ef57.spider@gentoo.org>, excerpted
below, on Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:42:35 +0200:
> begin quote
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:56:56 +0200
> Carsten Lohrke <carlo@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> The kde herd wants to give everyone the possibility to configure with
>> --enable-final via the "final" use flag. Additionally I thought about a
>> kde-misc category, which would include a bunch of kde related packages,
>> which are now mainly placed in app-misc, x11-misc, some in other
>> categories and a few are still in bugs.g.o.
>
>> Any objections?
>>
>>
> I'd object to the use of the word "final" for this, since its ambigous and
> hard to comprehend its meaning. I'd suggest finding a better word to
> describe the flag and its function.
The trouble is that's the upstream choice. From kdebase 3.3.0's
./configure --help:
--enable-final build size optimized apps (experimental [...])
Isn't one of the Gentoo policies to let upstream policy guide where
possible in such instances? Anyone that has worked on KDE sources should
instantly grok what such a use flag is about. If Gentoo calls it
something else, it will IMO make things /less/ clear.
Well, I guess the /one/ simpler possibility would be to call the flag
"enable-final", instead of simply "final", making it even clearer, but I'd
expect that wouldn't address your concern.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-30 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-26 15:56 [gentoo-dev] new global use flag and a new category Carsten Lohrke
2004-08-26 16:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2004-08-26 16:41 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-08-26 16:46 ` Caleb Tennis
2004-08-27 13:08 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-28 22:31 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-08-29 17:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-29 18:10 ` Carsten Lohrke
2004-08-29 18:32 ` Mike Frysinger
2004-08-30 10:05 ` Paul de Vrieze
2004-08-28 9:58 ` Markus Nigbur
2004-08-29 19:42 ` Spider
2004-08-30 8:51 ` Duncan [this message]
2004-08-30 11:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2004-08-30 14:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Carsten Lohrke
2004-09-01 20:47 ` William Hubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2004.08.30.08.51.19.855001@cox.net \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox