From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8BE198005 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5583FE0654; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C799E0574 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4291F33DDF4 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:03:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.663 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.957, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.704, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yfOVPDWrd-j0 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DB7033DB38 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9vqW-0002tR-BO for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:03:48 +0100 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:03:48 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:03:48 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: kerberos, virtuals, rattling cages Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:03:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <512ACBA1.7090209@gmail.com> <512B10E5.5080408@gentoo.org> <20130225080249.GB2634@gaby.caf.com.tr> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT db8adcf /usr/src/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) X-Archives-Salt: 6ceb22fe-ff9e-419a-956f-2a72a3630293 X-Archives-Hash: a4044e0fa9cb875b68298bdd89fc70fe Eray Aslan posted on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:02:49 +0200 as excerpted: >> > I don't think samba will support MIT, since it's kinda windows >> > focused. > > Ugh, no. MIT is not windows focused ... But samba is... As far as the thread in general goes, the question arises, if you're running both samba and nfs, why? They're both network-based-filesystems that in theory at least should have reasonably similar functionality, so an admittedly not particularly clueful reaction is "if it hurts when you do that, stop doing it". -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman