From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-65621-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43947138A1F
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:27:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04800E0D82;
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:27:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 218A5E0C57
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:27:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C4833FFB7
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:27:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=-1.036, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 6H3FJysKkWK3 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:27:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63FD433F9B5
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:27:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
id 1WXUBj-0005DX-5J
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:27:35 +0200
Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:27:35 +0200
Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:27:35 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:27:24 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan$cd03e$d016b05e$c76a764b$278f2be1@cox.net>
References: <534305C6.7020206@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net
User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT 2ae6aff
/usr/src/portage/src/egit-src/pan2)
Cc: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Archives-Salt: 7073f1f2-9ed7-4953-b5a8-6cd1d415f5ae
X-Archives-Hash: ad0fb0bb86003cbd9110240dd83c7303
Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 07 Apr 2014 23:08:38 +0300 as excerpted:
> Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you
> know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like regression from 0.1, speak
> up now.
>
> See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070
>
> (I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.)
FWIW, I have/had been running both netifrc-9999 and openrc-9999, along
with udev-init-scripts-26-r2. However I quite recently switched to
systemd for booting, so while they're still installed, I'm only using
trivial bits of openrc now, and perhaps (?) non of netifrc, tho I guess
I'm still using udev-init-scripts.
I've seen no problems related to those packages here, either before or
after I switched to systemd, save for the file-collisions that are the
reason both netif and udev-init-scripts must stabilize together (as in
the bug but not mentioned in your post.)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman