From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B9D215817D for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E3B12BC025; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DFAA2BC013 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sJ0bA-0003SM-NH for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:51:52 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v4] greadme.eclass: new eclass Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:51:48 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20240616155123.1016092-1-flow@gentoo.org> <45bcb8d5-bea7-49a2-81e8-ee2d161872bc@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; 579538c98bf359d128027ad3bfe006916faeef8e) X-Archives-Salt: af124d55-850c-41f9-80c2-3cccecd31e71 X-Archives-Hash: 9e94945340e3a76fce28eb2b22258b71 Arthur Zamarin posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:15:25 +0300 as excerpted: > On 16/06/2024 18.51, Florian Schmaus wrote: >> This new eclass includes various improvements over the existing >> readme.gentoo-r1.eclass. > > So, some weird question from me - why is it called greadme? I can > understand why you don't want to modify existing eclass, but why not > call it "readme.gentoo-r2.eclass"? This should make it a little less > confusing (cause I imagine folks asking - which to use. With -r2 we all > know which one is better). I had the same question but it was answered to my satisfaction in [PATCH v3 0/1]. Quoting from that: >>> [I]f anyone wants to have function names like >>> 'readme.gentoo-r2_pkg_postinst', then we can go with that. Convinced me! greadme's /just/ fine, thankyou! =:^) (Tho purely bikeshedding I'd prefer g2readme or gen2readme. Which FWIW would match my gentoo bug shortcut g2b/g2bug...) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman