From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815AE1388C0 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1985321C017; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACC32E07E8 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYo5d-0006FX-Bw for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 06:03:49 +0100 Received: from ip98-167-165-199.ph.ph.cox.net ([98.167.165.199]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 06:03:49 +0100 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip98-167-165-199.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 06:03:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <56CC937C.3030805@gentoo.org> <56CCD4DC.3040509@gentoo.org> <56CCFE65.5050201@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip98-167-165-199.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT a52b404) X-Archives-Salt: ea2f0ec6-1fe5-43e2-924c-dcde6b5de2cd X-Archives-Hash: 21f2328e16d9ad2ea8d3a30a9e480ccb Kent Fredric posted on Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:35:57 +1300 as excerpted: > Though personally I feel for the goal of stabilization tracking, you > aught to be analysing the git repo. Not only can you then see when a > given package was stabilised, but you can see the other packages that > were stabilized in its proximity, which is way too hard to do with the > Changelogs. Which I am (running from the git repo), and that ability to (as a user, easily) actually track all that extra data was one of my own biggest reasons for so looking forward to the git switch for so long, and is now one of the biggest reason's I'm a /huge/ supporter of the new git repo, in spite of the time it took and the imperfections it still has. =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman