From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE40138010 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5D27E08BE; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5505E079B for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A7A33BECC for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:55:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.47 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.140, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.328, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id reWeKGBQk-L2 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27332335DF4 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UN5Qa-0000nR-HV for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:55:24 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:55:24 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:55:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: bash-3.1 stable Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <515ACE47.3030206@gentoo.org> <20130402142933.2e76831c@portable> <515ACFDA.4090605@gentoo.org> <20130402143744.532b4ae8@portable> <20130402153403.0a85c0a7@portable> <20130402162104.407ab0f1@portable> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT 099bd57 /usr/src/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) X-Archives-Salt: 24866956-5019-48bc-9fbf-6ddda3901431 X-Archives-Hash: 61f2d24ece1ac5ba57617de1fffe73a3 Raymond Jennings posted on Tue, 02 Apr 2013 07:35:26 -0700 as excerpted: > You know guys, I just joined this list so I could get an inside look at > how gentoo development is supposed to work, and hopefully find a few > role models so I know what to do to get the ball rolling on becoming a > developer myself. > > I never expected to walk into this sort of tit for tat mud slinging > fest. > > Carry on or whatever but sheesh... LOL. Agreed. Tho in practice, if you're here long you do develop a rather thick hide. Nothing NEAR what it was a few years ago, tho. Before it gets anywhere near that, there's warnings, these days. AFAIK there has been no need to go beyond that for awhile, tho I'd /not/ be in a position to know, except for what's public here, which really /is/ better than it used to be, something I'm sure everyone here appreciates, especially the folks who were around back then to know how bad it /was/! -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman