From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48921381F3 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAD4FE0AF2; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E33AE0AEA for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E60B33BE3D for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:20:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.492 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.117, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.373, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a2GCrfcu8u5w for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D6F33DE8C for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UQTaf-0000PG-Jy for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:19:49 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:19:49 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 04:19:49 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc: pt_chown setuid going away by default Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <201304100115.53431.vapier@gentoo.org> <201304101532.41246.vapier@gentoo.org> <201304111249.01381.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT 0794297 /usr/src/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) X-Archives-Salt: b68e6029-3f0b-4bb4-a02f-9304cc381d5d X-Archives-Hash: 9b8f745f7a3f2c4fb0418764ddb27d45 Mike Frysinger posted on Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:49:00 -0400 as excerpted: > On Thursday 11 April 2013 11:43:59 James Cloos wrote: >> >>>>> "MF" == Mike Frysinger writes: >> MF> this should impact very few (if any) >> MF> users, so i don't think a news item makes sense. >> >> It will impact everyone who has /dev/pts in fstab(5). > > don't do that. delete the line. I wonder if I added my devpts fstab entry (if as you say it wasn't an automated add) some time ago, when there was some security related hubbub over it, as significantly, my fstab entry has nosuid, noexec, while the default for it in /etc/init.d/devfs does not. My fstab devpts entry also has noauto, but that's likely simply due to it being an fstab entry... Regardless, that's at least two gentooers with installations dating from the early 00s that have reported having the (GID-less) entry in fstab now, so I strongly suspect it's going to affect more users, at least long- time users, than you thought. It may in fact affect the majority of users from that era... anyone who hasn't manually removed that entry from fstab over the years. You mention it wasn't in the old baselayout/openrc tarballs. What about the early stages? Perhaps that's where it came from? Anyone with 2004.x vintage stage tarballs around to check? -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman