From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1612413877A for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76F91E0983; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87209E08D4 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9037333FE0A for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:15:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.169 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.157, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BUXAdWi9gJDq for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA45A33F5FA for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X2P3f-0002LT-31 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:15:03 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:15:03 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:15:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <53AB007C.5070306@gentoo.org> <20140625204457.6d6ed82b@pomiot.lan> <7201525.QuAkliyKH2@kailua> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT d447f7c /m/p/portage/src/egit-src/pan2) X-Archives-Salt: fc9fde46-26b6-4fd4-a80c-a8a27ca052f6 X-Archives-Hash: 6d5b739a9a13c8e123a4471965405bc6 Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:30:50 -0400 as excerpted: > Some things to think about include multilib (just another arch?), > systemd, > and usr-merge. I'm not saying that we need to implement any of that > stuff completely - but when planning the profile layout we should at > least consider whether it will handle things like this in the future. > Should some types of profiles be only additive? Etc... FWIW, systemd with merge to / (/usr being a symlink to . and sbin to bin) here. In particular, the merge "just works" with current portage. I'm no-multilib. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman