From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59711-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E111381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:44:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62DB6E0ADC;
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:44:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74EB4E0A49
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:44:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CA633DC75
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:44:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=-0.953, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.702,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id RfTkVzzmcKDs for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:44:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DAC433DE7D
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:44:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
id 1USZD6-00052C-5e
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:44:08 +0200
Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:44:08 +0200
Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:44:08 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc: pt_chown setuid going away by default
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:43:59 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <pan$56e39$6dd2a21c$9cc99219$ef067b09@cox.net>
References: <201304100115.53431.vapier@gentoo.org>
<201304121608.11373.vapier@gentoo.org>
<20130413190604.435c7cbf@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
<201304171435.28315.vapier@gentoo.org>
<CAGfcS_=wVX_25UR-MjNPZESNeO4g9t_R_9TtJs5W-suFov6fhA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net
User-Agent: Pan/0.140 (Chocolate Salty Balls; GIT 0794297
/usr/src/portage/src/egit-src/pan2)
X-Archives-Salt: ccf35fee-3089-4452-a9de-cf27bb56db7f
X-Archives-Hash: 7d4274e63e1dd16548b50f909742d5eb
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:36:59 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>> it's at times like this i wish we had a git repo. `git log -p -C -M`
>> is great at tracking this sort of stuff down.
>
> I don't want to hijack this thread, but I don't believe we have a
> tracker for the migration of docs / website / etc to git. Is there
> simply not interest? I'm not sure what complexities exist compared to
> the portage migration.
I'd guess that would be upto the docs team, etc. And while they might
conceivably be interested, it's evidently not a priority or (as
individual projects lack the complicating issues of the tree in general)
they'd probably have it done by now, just as the various other projects
already running git-based overlays or whatever.
The main tree is the big one, tho. With many projects already running
git internally, once the tree switches over, it's probably pretty safe to
assume everything else (possibly with an occasional exception) will as
well.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman