From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0151139694 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B970A1FC0CB; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61AC41FC0C2 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dasMZ-0006KA-NS for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 01:38:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org User-Agent: Pan/0.143 (Quaint little villages here and there; b4329315c) X-Archives-Salt: 398d3af0-e578-482b-b947-f47f556c3808 X-Archives-Hash: e4d46a93765cfcd13d02375f1dd5242b Michał Górny posted on Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:05:06 +0200 as excerpted: > ===Commit messages=== [...] > Historically, Gentoo has been using a few tags starting with X- > . However, this practice was abandoned once it has been pointed > out that git does not enforce any standard set of tags, and therefore > indicating non-standard tags is meaningless. Thanks for this historical note. I hadn't noticed, but if I had, I might have found the usage and then abandonment confusing, and this clears it up. =:^) > Gentoo developers are still frequently using Gentoo-Bug tag, s/developers are still frequently using/developers still frequently use/ The (past and continuing) tense that you're (apparently) trying to use, while common in other languages, isn't one English treats separately. > sometimes followed by Gentoo-Bug-URL. Using both > simultaneously is meaningless (they are redundant), and using the former > has no advantages over using the classic #nnnnnn form in the > summary or the body. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman