From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCA32139694 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBD631FC092; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 734F61FC08B for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1daqpe-0002Bp-CJ for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:34 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org User-Agent: Pan/0.143 (Quaint little villages here and there; b4329315c) X-Archives-Salt: 68e4e0f7-7e37-4b5c-85f9-77a769c96a4c X-Archives-Hash: dabea1cb98317ac29315ea75a722547a Michał Górny posted on Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:05:06 +0200 as excerpted: > ==Motivation== > Although the main Gentoo repository is using git for two years already, > developers still lack official documentation on how to use git > consistently. Most of the developers learn spoken standards from others > and follow them. This eventually brings consistency to some extent but > is suboptimal. Furthermore, it results in users having to learn things > the hard way instead of having proper documentation to follow. Just a couple grammar fixes: First sentence: s/repository is using git/repository has been using git/ Second: s/Most of the developers/Most developers/ -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman