From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-80298-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 113BB139694
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB9B6E0E0D;
	Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:19:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66B52E0DF2
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:19:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1d0PIT-0002wD-3C
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:19:41 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible <joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:16:17 +0200
Message-ID: <od4ln4$a1r$1@blaine.gmane.org>
References: <od4i5u$h86$1@blaine.gmane.org> <CAG6MAzSUqBS-qzRmETT3u48B=KXBQ0KjMQPqXLO=JDBmKjiv+g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10
X-Archives-Salt: 5cf6d073-45bc-4f0a-aaab-19a9bf0c0377
X-Archives-Hash: c38da0e569a1ffba3065b097d7eaf0e9

Hi Tomas,

Tomas Mozes wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1
>>
>> However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for me.
>> Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, because
>> there seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and one
>> unstable: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc
>>
>> Can someone shed some light on this?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jörg
>>
>>
>>
> On which platform do you have it unstable? The packages problem is
> probably related to:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612178

Amd64.

Yes, it might be the same problem. The ebuild for gcc-4.5.0-r3 on my machine 
lists amd64 as unstable after synching the tree while the ebuild available 
over packages.gentoo.org has a stable version in KEYWORDS.

Even if some GIT mirrors might be out of sync, it does not explain why 
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc lists the same version 
more than once.

Cheers,
Jörg