From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S082Y-0007ci-5x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:59:10 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8E9AE1CCA; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:59:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.jhcloos.com (eagle.jhcloos.com [207.210.242.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1EAE1C83 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eagle.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id C77424052A; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:58:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=eagle; t=1329901116; bh=Mk84k1w7mCPm3z45OhFj5iS2hWTznY4CK6o1Rd1/9g8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YrlJzM9W3FbyCXzdAfBwVTuU0d6rQkzLQHj/E1zmY8N+W5uSZ8/w41mV8tZ99sqL0 Y8SXsU5igdm4wwxXCy/27PULV08WdBFLb5yj32efZwHmMEDaBFxOVg1yukLA35Bh4w 9x0Z2ndtfwypPb1ofveM4X2CLlaBkqjujr/QQPA4= Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6C6D536004C; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:54:07 +0000 (UTC) From: James Cloos To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking In-Reply-To: (Ben's message of "Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:22:24 +0800") References: <1329770054.21166.12.camel@belkin4> <20120220190313.57892cfa@gentoo.org> <4F42F0AA.50004@gentoo.org> <20120220200220.3a54d88a@gentoo.org> <1329816398.2868.1.camel@belkin4> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC Copyright: Copyright 2012 James Cloos OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 03:54:07 -0500 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Hashcash: 1:30:120222:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org::DJJLTChNdl8qT733:000000000000000000000000000000000NJfKg X-Archives-Salt: ada3f0f6-4fd2-4e51-b190-46ce803e38e3 X-Archives-Hash: be8905e683f54c6540d8c873a0e853c3 >>>>> "B" == Ben writes: >> stabilizing Grub 2 ASAP is the sanest thing you can do, since even >> though it's also beta software, it's at least maintained by upstream. B> I would hesitate to say it's the *sanest* thing to do, but we should at B> least get it into ~arch and make sure our documentation is up to date. Actually, given grub2's crazy config, the real upgrade from grub1 is sys-boot/syslinux's extlinux(1). The configuration and operation styles are much more comfortable for those who are familiar with grub1. It would make a better default for x86/amd64 than grub1 or grub2. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6