* [gentoo-dev] Re: xinetd configuration
[not found] <m2668ja37w.fsf@columbus.localdomain>
@ 2001-11-09 17:49 ` Andreas Voegele
2001-11-09 20:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jerry A!
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Voegele @ 2001-11-09 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
> Thus the conversion from /etc/xinetd.conf to /etc/xinetd.conf will
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That should be /etc/inetd.conf, of course.
--
Bye,
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] xinetd configuration
[not found] <m2668ja37w.fsf@columbus.localdomain>
2001-11-09 17:49 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: xinetd configuration Andreas Voegele
@ 2001-11-09 20:30 ` Jerry A!
2001-11-10 1:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas Voegele
1 sibling, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jerry A! @ 2001-11-09 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:17:55AM +0100, Andreas Voegele wrote:
: Hi!
:
: On Mandrake systems the package management system can add and remove
: services from the xinetd configuration without problems since the file
: /etc/xinetd.conf includes all files that were put into the directory
: /etc/xinetd.d by the installed packages.
:
: I'm wondering why Gentoo does not use such a scheme.
:
: It may be a security risk to enable all installed services by default
: but then /etc/init.d/xinetd shouldn't create /etc/xinetd.conf from
It may be easier to just have a xinetd.conf with the only entry being
"includedir /etc/xinetd.d". Then you create a singular .conf file for
each service. Each portage that needs a xinetd entry simply installs
its conf file into /etc/xinetd.d. This is how pam/pam.d is currently
setup.
--Jerry
name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a
phone: 571.275.9795 || matter of life or death...
email: jerry@thehutt.org || ...It's much more important
|| than that!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: xinetd configuration
2001-11-09 20:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jerry A!
@ 2001-11-10 1:26 ` Andreas Voegele
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Voegele @ 2001-11-10 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Jerry Alexandratos writes:
> : On Mandrake systems the package management system can add and
> : remove services from the xinetd configuration without problems
> : since the file /etc/xinetd.conf includes all files that were put
> : into the directory /etc/xinetd.d by the installed packages.
> :
> : I'm wondering why Gentoo does not use such a scheme. [...]
> It may be easier to just have a xinetd.conf with the only entry
> being "includedir /etc/xinetd.d". Then you create a singular .conf
> file for each service. Each portage that needs a xinetd entry
> simply installs its conf file into /etc/xinetd.d. This is how
> pam/pam.d is currently setup.
That's what I meant. Mandrake puts the default values and the
includedir statement into /etc/xinetd.conf. Everything else goes into
the directory /etc/xinetd.d.
But in contrast to Mandrake it might be good to restrict the access to
the localhost for security reasons, eg by using "only_from=localhost"
as a default value or by putting a corresponding rule into
/etc/hosts.deny.
--
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-10 8:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <m2668ja37w.fsf@columbus.localdomain>
2001-11-09 17:49 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: xinetd configuration Andreas Voegele
2001-11-09 20:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jerry A!
2001-11-10 1:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas Voegele
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox