From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L6nAM-0007DC-4M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91A00E027C; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A72FE027C for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEC364314 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.071 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.071 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.528, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mN4ZXpi52z72 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F416439E for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L6n9s-00040Q-Ff for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:24 +0000 Received: from ppp-122-238.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.238.122]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:24 +0000 Received: from flameeyes by ppp-122-238.21-151.libero.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:20:24 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 15:20:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <49329690.7000409@gentoo.org> <1228053002.5981.12.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> <49329B9C.1020203@gentoo.org> <1228054661.5981.30.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-122-238.21-151.libero.it User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xjJbvPTBYnmjqa+KdW+j+sIzF5I= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 2a25c15c-f42b-4245-8ee9-4416be847b31 X-Archives-Hash: e4125c0a8a0317a2bb6180d16ead677a --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Scherbaum writes: > But what about additional slot or version attributes like > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ > (or a version attribute)? If slot and version aren't specified they'd be > interpreted as wildcards. The restrict attribute exists already and it's better to reuse the same code, isn't it? =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkyoSAACgkQe2h1+2mHVWOXAgCeKgoiEWKAr4VdCqEOzEIu92ON njEAoOeMbM2NtPiuX42Z8DVf5eJAscwD =ZjOl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--