From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXfBz-0004Yl-Pj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:13:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27727E04AE; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011FFE04AE for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D28644EA for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:13:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.42 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.42 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.179, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7O5jkOXfHO+g for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DA166ADC for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JXfBi-0002ro-Pc for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:12:50 +0000 Received: from adsl-ull-35-42.48-151.net24.it ([151.48.42.35]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:12:50 +0000 Received: from flameeyes by adsl-ull-35-42.48-151.net24.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:12:50 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Renaming the caps USE flag to libcap Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:12:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-ull-35-42.48-151.net24.it User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:CgQMTL6hXYljkVjVl3l4EEnewLo= Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: a720ce41-cd42-489c-8b87-f924a09c4b56 X-Archives-Hash: 65fc808267595953c1cdb27028678100 Tiziano M=C3=BCller writes: > Well, I'm not sure whether libcap is a good choice: What about > (not-yet-existing) apps which provide capability-support through anothe= r > package (like a foobar language libcap-wrapper)? Should they also use > libcap then? Uhm, good point. What about fscaps for the other case then? Or filecaps? --=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list