From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L1leE-0005T4-TT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17898E0310; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5313E0310 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E602E64461 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.053 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.053 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.546, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40fZnASjpqqG for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4055D6445C for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L1ldx-000277-1l for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:41 +0000 Received: from ppp-13-236.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.236.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:41 +0000 Received: from flameeyes by ppp-13-236.21-151.libero.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:42:41 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remember: workarounds don't warrant RESO FIXED! Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:42:25 +0100 Message-ID: References: <49204ECB.2020603@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-13-236.21-151.libero.it User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:HvG+Uc9KVUNoWO330ltKa37J2+0= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 81f90546-3242-4c70-bd3f-026c6ae2e3fa X-Archives-Hash: 97daede271e8b62867a7a144c69963f4 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Serkan Kaba writes: > I think, resolving as UPSTREAM might be more logical as we can't force > every upstream to fix their *borked* build system and the bug will be > left open forever. If upstream refuses to fix an issue that _is an issue_ we have to fix it, not work it around forever and ever. RESO UPSTREAM is good for crashes that are left to upstream, but since Gentoo si abuilt building, build problems needs to get fixed. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkgW4IACgkQe2h1+2mHVWPbkQCgttjJAwH+6HZW/ndAJjA2ci/D mkAAoNNsKXlNFZL530rETATT8x7e+57d =zVTf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--