From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30600-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Ju3hl-0001rM-B1
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 May 2008 10:50:29 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8BD2E024B;
Thu, 8 May 2008 10:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FB2E024B
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 May 2008 10:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5DD673FE
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 May 2008 10:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.596 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.597,
BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id A-SoBV1p+-E7 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Thu, 8 May 2008 10:49:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F9567222
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 May 2008 10:49:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1Ju3gx-0003VV-0k
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 08 May 2008 10:49:39 +0000
Received: from adsl-ull-250-54.48-151.net24.it ([151.48.54.250])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 08 May 2008 10:49:39 +0000
Received: from flameeyes by adsl-ull-250-54.48-151.net24.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 08 May 2008 10:49:39 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=)
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: lzma tarball usage
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 12:49:26 +0200
Message-ID: <m2fxst5avd.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost>
<1210169520.1464.16.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org>
<18465.49899.138685.587639@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
<pan.2008.05.08.08.06.38@cox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-ull-250-54.48-151.net24.it
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:J4psKLg+Ej96efmqCIMsric9Xok=
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 77d790ac-a339-42bd-8f88-e176af7bac9f
X-Archives-Hash: 13c70a09bc6ad742d869b9488c5a43ab
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> writes:
>> So it would also be possible to compile "lzmadec" without any need for
>> C++. Just call "make" in subdirs liblzmadec and lzmadec.
>
> What about USE=3Ddecode-only or something similar for lzma-utils, then? =
If=20
> desired, it could even be masked on "normal" profiles, but would then be=
=20
> there for the embedded and releng folks.
USE=3Dcxx should do just fine, it will disable the C++-related parts,
whatever they are. Sincerely I'd quite like to enable it on my vserver's
build chroots too.
(BTW I considered using lzma for backup compression, but I didn't get
much different results from bzip2 in term of size, but took quite longer
in case of compression... I still have some doubts whether lzma is worth
it).
=2D-=20
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkgi2rYACgkQe2h1+2mHVWMP3gCfRIAWu9etzeudzFVHE2/nGjGt
B7kAni4aIqXwwvWDGXitqXHsCATeWvSP
=9Sit
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list