From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVv3t-0000rJ-MB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:45:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0703EE0537; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1350E0537 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEB365E9F for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:45:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.681 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.681 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.571, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v+tr6eUqnsNe for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C0965486 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2008 20:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JVv3h-0004Ue-Af for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:45:21 +0000 Received: from adsl-ull-35-42.48-151.net24.it ([151.48.42.35]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:45:21 +0000 Received: from flameeyes by adsl-ull-35-42.48-151.net24.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:45:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: One request for the next SoC: non already-devs students Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 21:45:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-ull-35-42.48-151.net24.it User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZKxKTxhP/S7IRugLQO9XEVrryq8= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 9648ba09-b86a-4044-9cb8-52118c710e5f X-Archives-Hash: b364e8880a488a6959f7aefe1289e22f --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Alec Warner" writes: > Your entire argument is based on the assumption that the Summer of > Code program's primary goal is to recruit new developers for Open > Source projects. While this is one goal I am unsure if holding it > above the others is necessary. I know it's not the _sole_ goal of Summer of Code as intended by Google. But I do think it should be the main goal for Gentoo as a project. I also knew it was already discussed in the FAQ, and that there is no _Google_ rule stopping Gentoo developers from partecipating as Gentoo students. And that is why I'm bringing up the point on Gentoo ground. If this works, I'd take this time to add this as an official point for the next council meeting. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHyxHXe2h1+2mHVWMRApz7AKCL9OAD/xJPDqNZxVQyh4xG4MWaxwCgotDq BAiaudICz1I9yUhqqmQVlws= =7VjH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list