From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KoHIS-00056M-TZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DD4CE05CA; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05375E05CA for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE96864C06 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.058 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.058 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.541, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Z4RDxS+r6iG for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1206864A4A for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KoHIA-0004HQ-9Y for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:26 +0000 Received: from ppp-120-232.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.232.120]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:26 +0000 Received: from flameeyes by ppp-120-232.21-151.libero.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:40:26 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:40:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20081009181101.GE21770@gentoo.org> <20081010000500.b405d25b.genone@gentoo.org> <20081010042123.f5c2b7f9.genone@gentoo.org> <20081010071516.GA12145@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-120-232.21-151.libero.it User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mj67fS/Vo8f+Dh+qo9lfORFo9m8= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: c1f7db22-6750-4abf-b24f-3bab70395fed X-Archives-Hash: 57b05b863a0d26e29b0f329db7b25df8 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fabian Groffen writes: > - x64 is what the vendors (Apple, Sun) advertise themselves Err I'm sure I haven't seen any x64 in the documentation or advertisement of my MacBook Pro, are you sure _Apple_ uses that totally bogus name? Anyway, em64t might be better, but then again you're to the same point: an Opteron using an Intel name? I think amd64 is totally fine since it's the first commercial name it got by uh, those who introduced it, I guess, but the only thing I don't ever want to see officially is endorsing the x64 commercial speak. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjvTS0ACgkQe2h1+2mHVWMtvwCg2bE/iGTURFLoAxYXAnxvaYLp /ncAoJoi7b53eUoU9ht+HdUk+AzTm/Vl =Av6K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--