From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCDkN-0003DK-9j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:39:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96595E0BE5; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3F5E0BE5 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009A665082 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:37:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.528 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.528 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.788, BAYES_20=-0.74] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lLRS7FW6DNAu for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430346519C for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JCDi2-0003T4-CC for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:37:34 +0000 Received: from adsl-ull-74-61.48-151.net24.it ([151.48.61.74]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:37:34 +0000 Received: from flameeyes by adsl-ull-74-61.48-151.net24.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:37:34 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 13:37:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080108083000.GL14600@supernova> <3c32af40801080420o1fc856caga3187e74bbb843e6@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-ull-74-61.48-151.net24.it User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:y+bVBA1cglPfN9DhH6oHcZs/YI0= Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 705133e9-f80c-4828-9540-0bd0b6218485 X-Archives-Hash: 94d009033efc1f1234fd40e7a5721d59 "Santiago M. Mola" writes: > Having a complete > deptree and having a small system package set should be independent > goals, maybe your proposal should focus on making possible to have a > deptree as complete as possible independently of what packages are on > system set. QA team already rejected such a proposal. --=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list