From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L745H-0005Ij-1a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:24:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5DB2E027F; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EDAE027F for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B7D642D4 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:24:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.074 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.074 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.525, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xAIS6UYVgw6 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EAC642B9 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1L7450-0003gr-Sq for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:24:31 +0000 Received: from ppp-122-238.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.238.122]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:24:30 +0000 Received: from flameeyes by ppp-122-238.21-151.libero.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:24:30 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:24:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <49329690.7000409@gentoo.org> <1228053002.5981.12.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> <1228057415.25651.105.camel@localhost> <4932AC9D.2000401@gentoo.org> <1228064022.25651.151.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-122-238.21-151.libero.it User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wMZhGOytBvh2AzYvNnxfJ5xJjVo= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: c8e20907-b4a9-40fc-8143-aad266137ddf X-Archives-Hash: 813dd87e318d4aa56f965ac518f57baf --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Alec Warner" writes: > - Space savings. Certainly your scheme may be smaller, but the XML > tag overhead may eat into the savings. You should do some estimates > to show the community how much smaller the tree will be from this > proposal. Sorry but you lost me on any point you might have brought across since after this I feel like you were trying to put words in my mouth. Beside, if you really want to go down that road you should be counting that beside ReiserFS with tail, I don't remember any other Linux FS that has block smaller than 512bytes, which means that each file in metadata cache is taking up much more than just its size in characters. All your math is thus wrong. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkznzMACgkQe2h1+2mHVWNR6ACggcCbB9RkDyxofEJUtVwwl8YW wxsAniTGB06vNF7wEsTaiasOBPKFXd2C =ApsM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--