From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K4Kc6-0002rV-K3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:55:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75E83E06DC; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0AAE06DC for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38DC66B5E for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:55:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.827 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.827 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.828, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNuPbcKbGoiB for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A21E66940 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K4Kc2-0002hY-5o for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:55:02 +0000 Received: from ppp-82-238.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.238.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:55:02 +0000 Received: from flameeyes by ppp-82-238.21-151.libero.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:55:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:54:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <3c32f69c0806041700h42cc5110y34400ec34184e77c@mail.gmail.com> <1212690820.2631.1@spike> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-82-238.21-151.libero.it User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:rnTg0+ew+SFb9NQVS4Q0Ch75gUg= Sender: news Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 9b888b53-e3d1-4922-8193-0f688cdbec25 X-Archives-Hash: c5ae365707478fa5d82e7d2b9f2a46a4 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roy Bamford writes: > 1. Please tell us how/if you plan to fix GLEP 39. (You may not consider=20 > it broken) Need to address better when a meeting is considered official (right now it's not addressed at all, so anything is better), for the rest is fine as it is. > 2. As one of the first priorities will be setting policy for pending=20 > appeals what policy do you propose ? Council handles appeals, there's no conflict of interests: who gets voted in is already known to not be entirely impartial and/or being in charge of other decsion-making teams. > 4. How do you think the council and trustees can work together to make=20 > Gentoo better? > Not just the code base but the cooperative environment we all work=20 > together in too.=20 > Disclosure - I have a personal interest in responses as a trustee. Staying independent one of the other, with no hierarchical relationship one way or the other. > 5. Tell us a little about yourself - the skills and experience you can=20 > bring to the council? If you know me you know what I do, if you don't, I suggest just looking at my blog (http://blog.flameeyes.eu/) there it's all you have to know, and probably something you don't care about. > 6. Tell us one outstanding (in your own mind) contribution you made to=20 > Gentoo in the last year. Last year? Being a council member already, I'd say. > Any candidate who does not have time/interest to prepare a manifesto=20 > addressing the above and anything else they want to say to the=20 > electorate will have a hard time convincing me that they have the time/ > interest to undertake the duties of a council member.=20 You might want to revisit your ideas, unless you expect next council elections to require primaries first. I sincerely don't want to spend time to rewrite this as a "manifesto" because it makes really not much sense. I don't take an opinion _just_ for the election, my opinions are open to anybody to see. And I did have time and interest in stayin in the council for two terms already. With all sincerity, your "threat" makes me want to puke: if we're being forced to write manifestos, I might just as well reject my nomination, as I find that just useless bureaucracy. And no I won't be wearing a Gentoo logo pin on my lapel. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhINmEACgkQe2h1+2mHVWNm1gCeKlBCsL3UUUCvHj8U2cFQC97O ogEAoKI6OhGt/6Guo5pnBoT/CrFfwyOF =RRkq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list