From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31869 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jul 2003 18:24:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 7813 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2003 18:24:18 -0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org From: Heribert Slama Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 19:26:38 +0200 Organization: (none) Message-ID: References: <200307261430.28191.vapier@gentoo.org> Reply-To: h.slama@gmx.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553 Sender: news Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl conflicts with dev-perl/ExtUtil-MakeMaker? X-Archives-Salt: 58a7b951-c03f-4892-a268-e53a90bffbee X-Archives-Hash: 86d983278340c91f42dcb411d5b87b6a On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:30:24 -0400, in gmane.linux.gentoo.devel, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >On Saturday 26 July 2003 11:14, Ferris McCormick wrote: >> Is this behavior intended? > >yes, unmerge blocking packages Umh, what about GWN http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20030728-newsletter.xml, "Radical changes to perl module handling"? I'm only a simple user, I understood only ~10%;;-) Best regards, -Heribert -- Heribert Slama Muttenz, Switzerland -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list