From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66944-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096931391DB
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:41:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDB65E0F8A;
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:41:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90C2E0F85
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:41:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3639E340001
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:41:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=-0.247, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ZRlmz4VxOGVV for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:41:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C3CB33F7F8
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
id 1XB51p-0003wI-3I
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:41:01 +0200
Received: from ppp118-209-216-121.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net ([118.209.216.121])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:41:01 +0200
Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-216-121.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:41:01 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: About current ppc/ppc64 status
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 02:40:49 +1000
Message-ID: <lr0lmg$8li$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <1406316517.20388.22.camel@gentoo.org> <53D2B248.4090004@gentoo.org> <1406317833.20388.24.camel@gentoo.org> <53D2B6A0.4070009@gentoo.org> <20140725200743.GA5497@linux1> <1406363809.20388.32.camel@gentoo.org> <1406364266.20388.34.camel@gentoo.org> <20140726153904.GA13389@linux1> <20140726162011.GB13389@linux1>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-216-121.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
In-Reply-To: <20140726162011.GB13389@linux1>
X-Archives-Salt: 72d534ec-b1c7-4b27-bec0-2a10bc0dae4c
X-Archives-Hash: 1dd4277fc26b679e4d13b1ac8fe3cca8
On 07/27/2014 02:20 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> I know I'm replying to my own message, but I do have a concern about
> this that I want to ask about.
>
> When a stable request is filed for a package, it is filed for all
> architectures which have the ~arch keyword for the package and are
> marked stable or dev in profiles.desc.
I normally only target archs that are already stable for that package.
There's a lot of packages in the tree stable for eg. amd64/x86 and
testing for all others.