From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66539-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E7813877A
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:17:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70C74E08A0;
Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:17:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7832DE087D
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:17:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A16E33FE23
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:17:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=-0.278, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.652,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id jLbpRSriLEDS for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:17:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF23D33FDA9
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:17:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
id 1X4Y5I-0007o2-0P
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 18:17:36 +0200
Received: from ppp118-209-164-198.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net ([118.209.164.198])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 18:17:36 +0200
Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-164-198.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 18:17:36 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: The request to abolish games team policy
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 02:17:16 +1000
Message-ID: <lph5id$oph$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20140707234502.3009929a@pomiot.lan> <lpgii1$kik$1@ger.gmane.org> <20140708133859.3bc01349@pomiot.lan> <CAGfcS_mO_G6oDdo2ZuF8kvJUmp7WvxNbi2dbzje4FcdtA5vPtQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAB_KkxxndmYZij27cv-yhh45or4KKJzN4o=xXYseFf1cDYBNaQ@mail.gmail.com> <53BC0CCA.4000702@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-164-198.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
In-Reply-To: <53BC0CCA.4000702@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: b53a6bf1-463e-4368-8e23-da0ff4cc0401
X-Archives-Hash: 2d9a00bb4ae20d4611b0321a13cb2637
On 07/09/2014 01:22 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> And some personal thoughts about the initial proposal...
> I don't care about the suggestion 3. in mgorny's proposal at all, but 1.
> and 2. should definately
> stay as is.
What authority does the game team have over anything? Did it get special
blessing from the Council? Isn't it just another regular project as per
GLEP 39?