From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A25113877A for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0EA3E0B5B; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE537E0ACE for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89F7340039 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:48:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.236 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.225, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dPQJ_LinhaBV for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9072D340033 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WzvzA-0002gj-5u for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:48:12 +0200 Received: from hsi-kbw-109-192-107-076.hsi6.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([109.192.107.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:48:12 +0200 Received: from joerg.schaible by hsi-kbw-109-192-107-076.hsi6.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:48:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmc=?= Schaible Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Changes in installed ebuilds Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:48:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1403570947.24976.1.camel@rook> <53A9E3EA.1050203@sumptuouscapital.com> <53A9EA70.8060207@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hsi-kbw-109-192-107-076.hsi6.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de User-Agent: KNode/4.12.5 X-Archives-Salt: 53885850-a15a-4a29-8dff-9155ac9a50a2 X-Archives-Hash: 5c5f7c21f0c2cf9fa850ff26a9e6f4d8 hasufell wrote: > Kristian Fiskerstrand: >> On 06/24/2014 09:25 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>> Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: >> >>>> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: >>>>> So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib changed >>>>> for an existing ebuild without increasing its version (e.g. >>>>> dbus-glib-0.100.2-r2)? >>>> >>>> Please see >>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/91615 >> >>> These blocks had nothing to do with the multilibs ABI. It has been >>> just the updated versions for the dependencies. >> >> >> For what it is worth, I completely agree significant changes to stable >> ebuilds (hereunder changes to dependencies) should get a revision bump >> and go through normal stabilization procedures. >> >> > > That would be a waste of time and would increase the overall workload on > arch teams who already need 2-4 weeks to keep up with the queue. There > is no reason to re-stabilize a package after a build-time bug has been > fixed by adjusting the version of a dependency. > > Moreover, the fix that was applied was very important. And, since the official tree did not have an older version of those deps anyway, the upgrade in the stable dependent ebuilds was unnecessary. It just broke the tree for users with local or other overlays. - Jörg