From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43758138BF3 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A136AE0BB5; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4CDAE0B27 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A532F33F8FF for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:19:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.927 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.927 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.274, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J90lEyrHVAyZ for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116D333F12F for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:19:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WF5Mz-0006Bx-1e for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 18:19:09 +0100 Received: from ppp118-209-75-102.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net ([118.209.75.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 18:19:09 +0100 Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-75-102.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 18:19:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: repoman feature request / profiles.desc profile types Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 04:18:56 +1100 Message-ID: References: <201402161758.43311.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-75-102.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: <201402161758.43311.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 1209bb48-fe36-44d4-b467-c1a14ff25a55 X-Archives-Hash: 9b61aefa2a43f2a3d0c6327cc94d29fe On 02/17/2014 03:58 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Why not make it possible to keep an ~arch only deptree consistent?! amd64-fbsd already does this with a stable profile. They just choose to not actually have any stable keywords. In my opinion, the profile type is better as a description of that profile, rather than a signifier of what keywords are permitted.