From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D63138330 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 627E5E0B7D; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E090E0B5E for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.142] (helo=NeddySeagoon_Static) by smarthost01c.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1eZbI2-0003nn-4x for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:44:58 +0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:44:24 +0000 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <5975969.qpFnRmUSA1@pinacolada> (from dilfridge@gentoo.org on Thu Jan 11 01:03:33 2018) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.5.3 Message-Id: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-rGInqo6Out55RNVQC8lu" X-Originating-smarthost01c-IP: [62.3.120.142] Feedback-ID: 62.3.120.142 X-Archives-Salt: 7072a6fa-86ca-432e-8bf7-3eb0b743b16f X-Archives-Hash: cac6b430465d6193da487ff0a20e6a42 --=-rGInqo6Out55RNVQC8lu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2018.01.11 01:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Does being 'struck off' the list in this way apply to devs, > including > > Council and comrel members? >=20 > So far noone has even considered "striking" devs off the list. If this > even=20 > were to happen ever, it would have to be backed by a full comrel team > decision=20 > / vote. And these don't happen often, don't happen quickly, and don't > happen=20 > lightly. (I much prefer fixing the glibc ebuilds, horrible as these > may be.) >=20 > We have now an imperfect solution to an unneccessary problem. If > anyone can=20 > come up with a better solution (that is still an improvement over > doing=20 > nothing), I'm all ears. List moderation is not one, since a) it still > hasn't=20 > been implemented technically, b) even if that were done, we would > still=20 > require an active moderation team, and c) then we start bikeshedding > about the=20 > moderation rules. >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Andreas K. H=FCttel > dilfridge@gentoo.org > Gentoo Linux developer > (council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) Andreas, Does removing non @gentoo.org email address from the ML not require=20 that process too? Gentoo does not have any other disiplinary process than the action by=20 comrel that you describe. --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (Neddyseagoon) a member of elections gentoo-ops forum-mods = --=-rGInqo6Out55RNVQC8lu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8iqN0lnEsghF0U/tVl/TNarc5wkFAlpXThgACgkQVl/TNarc 5wnIpw/7BRKH4UZEeDL1hRbQ1AZcfi5FJ9rQLlYtmnfK8xNb9UwVfhdhiY2YnoTz JGVUyPmJQ8ehWifIeyH2VXiOPI8I1fMmYP0WWmvcXOieYo+WgViKYVCWV0WNdhJo W7hPkM9aumBadoXzuvdZT0deuiVPNc1Oatw8w0NXhZ6Twrfhm1M2WxjAS9UK4l2a DQYlId+hzsdBFLeGhNqz7PApo/rbFumBc7ddQLJG633RtxDXBZ/cWIL4mt6bAKk2 LGnGa3pkz6VzVdG9qE39L4ONh4hHICF4mxasJWBtVYdojhTHhop7TqX92fuXxiL7 xRuG7OC6JxEDKnYzFW0rKoj84hB1ROlOqYCqm71kui/fDu05uILnm6aZgqe5E6FA 1Hvcl+grqlulAnv033YmRu/0okvReFZei04M2U7/iuk+a+yIUSv5vx4lZlW2Z2Oz wO1OheEfrIx2zJEXl0sdDIERtLv3gHjYrB4E6f9vyATK9zHQNcAuy/XjYFRfAuZ7 7HkuVpJ2pOskVvpzJm/6N5e9hshZA4f3MJekBrD4GeG5rV8/r/CFRI1H8jtuT8Nf nHRnrMyHPzSvxojPiqiYTbvAU/cEOEsheITN00RYXCSVHS7Q1UxoXjtwifb6iM6L ps7irOQFwKNtISRnEy2Jed543mH4aPSOzhqIF/MNroB9nQYGRqk= =1b7d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-rGInqo6Out55RNVQC8lu--