From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89921381F3 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DB50E09CD; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACBECE09C2 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9CC33E5FC for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:55:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.083 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.083 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.011, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.07, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b2A7bHD1v_D5 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE26F33E442 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ur4Q9-0002vJ-Tj for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:54:53 +0200 Received: from ppp118-209-15-147.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net ([118.209.15.147]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:54:53 +0200 Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-15-147.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:54:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Hangouts Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:54:33 +1000 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-15-147.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 9f4efdcf-eedb-46bf-a75c-fac33582d122 X-Archives-Hash: 8f95615b4d6a3ec7d0df082a12938294 On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote: > That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts will > be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held by teams or developers > independent of a team. The main goal is to have the teams introduce > themselves and discuss about different issues in their Gentoo-related > projects. Thanks for taking the time and initiative to work on something new, I am sure it will prove interesting. It is the response that confuses me - I don't understand why everyone is rushing to shut it down before it even begins. For those that are not interested in the idea of a video hangout, just don't use it and move on - simple.