From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A7813893E for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A7DA21C0BC; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F368621C01C for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3896B33E326 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:06:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.516 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.513, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-t276BD8kOk for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F8F633E30C for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4B4J-0003nd-Dp for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:06:15 +0100 Received: from ppp118-209-230-206.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net ([118.209.230.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:06:15 +0100 Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-230-206.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:06:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Michael Palimaka Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: On the good usage of subslots Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:05:46 +1100 Message-ID: References: <20130209091503.1f75352d@gentoo.org> <5116537C.3050201@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-230-206.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 In-Reply-To: <5116537C.3050201@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 37481673-da7c-4c1d-a794-19083d87ab16 X-Archives-Hash: a8ad34bba318d487969109120a15b9dc On 10/02/2013 00:47, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 09/02/13 14:15, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> Dear fellow developers, > > I didn't find anything to reply directly here, so sorry for stealing > this message. > > I just wanted to point out that people have lately been adding deps like: > > media-libs/libpng:= > dev-libs/openssl:= > > That is wrong as it completely ignores the SLOTting of these packages. > They need to be: > > media-libs/libpng:0= > dev-libs/openssl:0= > > As in, before you add any subslotting to any library, you need to check > for it's binary-only SLOTs! > > Thanks, > Samuli > > > Is there a difference in behaviour between 'media-libs/libpng:=' and 'media-libs/libpng' with no slot information at all?