From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D5313800E for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 06:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B70E5E07F0; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 06:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306EFE07D8 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 06:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FD01B40B6 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 06:57:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.128 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.128 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.118, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id In0Mr-b9vUIm for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 06:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D5F1B4091 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 06:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sv0xH-0001BO-IA for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 08:56:51 +0200 Received: from athedsl-344012.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.199.106]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 08:56:51 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-344012.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 08:56:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5 Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:56:33 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-344012.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120720 Thunderbird/14.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: fde3c5cd-5968-474f-8765-1b38df1bab96 X-Archives-Hash: dfbbefe78cee2f35e0a420c19f7c888c On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: >> On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> [...] >>> So what would be the methodology of making sure a package has the proper >>> slot? >> >> Obviously you would need to make sure that the package actually does >> support Qt5. Then, as I see it, we could do either: >> >> || ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 x11-libs/qt-gui:5 ) >> > > This is wrong because qt4 and qt5 are not binary compatible. > >> or: >> >> qt4? ( x11-libs/qt-gui:4 ) >> qt5? ( x11-libs/qt-gui:5 ) >> > > This is the only alternative AFAICS. In that case, if Qt5 is installed, the application might depend on Qt4, but when building it, might link against Qt5.