From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50329-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1S7R3Q-0001Nz-Ms
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:42:16 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D4B8E0AC8;
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:42:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CA8E09DC
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:41:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A561B408A
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:41:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id QFPNQBEKV2WN for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:41:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0875B64776
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
id 1S7R2T-00034C-UN
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:41:17 +0100
Received: from host195-176-dynamic.47-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it ([79.47.176.195])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:41:17 +0100
Received: from marcopaolone by host195-176-dynamic.47-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:41:17 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Marco Paolone <marcopaolone@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization requests from users
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:41:05 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: Marco Paolone <marco@localhost.invalid>
Message-ID: <jjnf91$64d$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <jjlh0t$osa$1@dough.gmane.org> <4F5EFB3E.4080603@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host195-176-dynamic.47-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it
User-Agent: tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (Linux/3.1.10-gentoo-r1 (i686))
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: f4a89308-e04d-4eb1-87a9-b2b4556e2361
X-Archives-Hash: 9495e3d5edd3eafea6daac6de34b1b4b
On mar, 13 2012 08:46:06, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 3/12/12 7:58 PM, Marco Paolone wrote:
>> scarabeus recently posted on his blog [1] about submission of stabiliz=
ation
>> requests from users. Since using bugzilla could be a mess of duplicate=
d
>> entries, I was thinking about a "Stabilization Party" once a month for=
example,
>> in order to have a coherent list of stabilizations, and users working =
togheter
>> with you developers. How does it sound?
>=20
> Don't worry about perfection (at least for now).
>=20
> Just start filing stabilization requests, and _if_ it results in a mess
> of duplicates (I don't think so) we can think about better process.
>=20
> By the way, commenting on existing stable requests (success reports are
> also valuable) is another great way to contribute.
=20
So, let's see how thing goes, eventually we can even talk again about it,=
if
there will be problems.
Thanks!
--=20
Linux Registered User #401479
GPG: 0x897AF14E