From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-47897-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1R7YS1-0002u9-N8
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:03:53 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB3EC21C0E4;
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A18721CA80
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:03:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D52E1B4008
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:03:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -5.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.001 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.598,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id l1cADtWM6u+b for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:03:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E981B4014
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:02:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
id 1R7YR7-0003Wy-JY
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:02:57 +0200
Received: from athedsl-375866.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.20.56])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:02:57 +0200
Received: from realnc by athedsl-375866.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:02:57 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: zlib breakage
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:02:33 +0300
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <j5ld16$sn$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <j5iukv$v5h$1@dough.gmane.org> <201109240124.01627.vapier@gentoo.org> <j5ju7q$ei4$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAJaTeTr+D8Ga-U3TXti5vbv4GnjfgNkE0KB+Y4xXGvWL8Ab+Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-375866.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110920 Thunderbird/6.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJaTeTr+D8Ga-U3TXti5vbv4GnjfgNkE0KB+Y4xXGvWL8Ab+Eg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 7511595af1e1d8909a5cda1c4d2e0a23
On 09/24/2011 10:07 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 02:43, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> On 09/24/2011 08:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> the defines in question are internal to zlib. packages relying on them
>>> are broken, plain and simple.
>>
>> Then fix *them*, not zlib.
>
> they are being fixed already
>
>> Then why did you "fix" zlib instead of those bad packages?
>
> i have no idea what you're talking about. they're both getting fixed.
You are right. I will stop posting about this. I'm sorry for the noise
I caused.